Transdiciplinary Approach to Making Science-Based Transgenic Products Policy Recommendations

Authors

  • Agus Pakpahan Indonesian Center for Agricultural Socio Economic and Policy Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v10n1.2012.1-15

Keywords:

keamanan hayati, produk rekayasa genetik, transdisiplin, tanaman transgenik, biosafety, genetically engineered products, transdisciplinary, transgenic crops

Abstract

The Government Regulation No. 21, 2005 of biosafety for genetically engineered products considers aspects of religions, ethics and aesthetics in its policy recommendations and produces recommendations based on the precautionary principle and justifiable scientific methods. The formula developed by Choi (2005) was provided as an example of a science-based policy recommendation making process. Since solving a certain problem cannot be done without regarding the possible emergence of new problems, a transdisciplinary knowledge-based recommendation making will provide better outcome. The general conclusion is that we need to develop our institutional capacity in order to be able to apply a method of policy recommendation making process in the format of transdiciplinary approach to making science-based transgenic products policy recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antofie, M.M., and C. Sand. 2009. Insights into the biotech policy and Europeans tendency. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 41(2): 3-8.

Choi,B.C.K. 2005. Twelve essentials of science-based policy. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Oct [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/oct/05_0005.htm

Falck-Zepeda, J.B. 2009. Socio-economic considerations, Article 26.1 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: What are the issues and what is at stake? AgBioForum 12(1): 90-107. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.agbioforum.org

Johnson, G. 1986. Research methodology for economists: philosophy and practice. Macmillan.

Ramessar, K., T. Capell, R. M. Twyman, H. Quemada, and P. Christou. 2009. Calling the tunes on transgenic crops: the case forregulatory harmony. Mol Breeding 23:99–112 DOI 10.1007/s11032-008-9217-z. http://www.writescience.com/RMT%20PDFs/Ramessar%20et%20al%20MOLB%202009.pdf

Thompson, P.B. 2003. Value Judgments and Risk Comparisons: The Case of Genetically Engineered Crops. Plant Physiology 132: 10-16

Downloads

Published

15-08-2016

Issue

Section

Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian

How to Cite

1.
Pakpahan A. Transdiciplinary Approach to Making Science-Based Transgenic Products Policy Recommendations. Analisis Kebijak. Pertan. [Internet]. 2016 Aug. 15 [cited 2025 May 18];10(1):1-15. Available from: https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/index.php/akp/article/view/1057