Mengatasi paradoks perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan: transformasi kebijakan insentif spasial di Kabupaten Gorontalo

Addressing the paradox of food agricultural land protection: transforming spatial incentive policies in Gorontalo Regency

Authors

  • Merita Ayu Indrianti Program Studi Agribisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
  • Ivan Taslim Program Studi Geografi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
  • Yusriyah Atikah Gobel Program Studi Agribisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
  • Aditya Djaini Program Studi Agribisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo
  • Moh. Muchlis Djibran Program Studi Agribisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v24n1.2026.1-13

Keywords:

LP2B, agricultural land conversion, policy effectiveness, food security, Analytic Hierarchy Process

Abstract

The conversion of productive agricultural land poses a threat to Indonesia's food security. Although sustainable food agricultural land (LP2B) is legally protected under Law No. 41/2009, protected areas continue to experience land conversion, creating a policy paradox that undermines long-term food security. This study aims to develop and validate a spatial vulnerability model for LP2B areas in Gorontalo Regency. Unlike previous studies that primarily focused on land conversion or zoning effectiveness, this study integrates stakeholder-based Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), remote sensing, and Geographic Information System (GIS) to reveal the LP2B policy paradox and support spatially targeted policy interventions. A multi-method approach was applied using Sentinel imagery (2017–2023) with the Random Forest classification algorithm. Spatial vulnerability factors (land conversion, flood, and drought risks) were modeled and weighted through AHP based on stakeholder perspectives. The results revealed a policy paradox: while the total paddy field area increased by a net of 4,158.83 ha, protected LP2B areas experienced a net loss of 23.76 ha. Land conversion risk received the highest AHP weight (60%). The composite vulnerability model demonstrated very high retrospective spatial coincidence, with all observed LP2B losses occurring in moderate- and high-vulnerability zones. These findings indicate that development pressures associated with location rent outweigh existing passive regulatory instruments and support a shift toward spatially targeted active incentive policies to strengthen LP2B protection and long-term food security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansar Z, de Vries WT. 2024. Urban sprawl symptoms in Bandar Lampung suburban area, Indonesia. Geoplanning J Geomatics Plan. 11(2):205–222. https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.11.2.205-222

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2023. Luas panen dan produksi padi di Indonesia 2021 [Internet]. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; [diakses 2025 Sep 15]. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/08/03/a78164ccd3ad09bdc88e70a2/luas-panen-dan-produksi-padi-di-indonesia-2022.html

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Gorontalo. Kabupaten Gorontalo dalam angka 2024 [Internet]. Gorontalo: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Gorontalo; [diakses 2025 Des 19] https://gorontalokab.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/f3d6afcc8df06f2453ce5b8f/kabupaten-gorontalo-dalam-angka-2024.html

Baker DJ, Nye C, Wheeler R, Masquelier C, Binner A, Gaston KJ, Heard MS, Lobley M, Smith D, Maclean IMD. 2025. Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri-environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes. People Nat. 7(2):329‒345. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10785

Berger I, Bhan M, Bhangaonkar R, Chaudhary A, Mallapu GR, Nair T, Ramireddy E, Raj R, Ramprasad V, Sankararaman V. 2025. Integrated land systems for sustainable food production and biodiversity conservation in the semi-arid to moist tropics: stakeholder perspectives from Andhra Pradesh, India. Front Sustain Food Syst. 9:1594356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1594356

Bourgoin C, Oszwald J, Bourgoin J, Gond V, Blanc L, Dessard H, Phan T Van, Sist P, Läderach P, Reymondin L. 2020. Assessing the ecological vulnerability of forest landscape to agricultural frontier expansion in the central highlands of Vietnam. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 84:101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.101958

Diaconu DC, Peptenatu D, Gruia AK, Grecu A, Gruia AR, Gruia MF, Drăghici CC, Băloi AM, Alexandrescu MB, Sibinescu RB. 2025. The impact of urban expansion on land use in emerging territorial systems: case study Bucharest-Ilfov, Romania. Agriculture. 15(406):1‒15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15040406

Fandani H, Harini R. 2020. Impact and economic value of agricultural land conversion in sub-urban of Bantul Regency. E3S Web Conf. 200:03005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020003005

Ilham N, Sumaryanto, Azis M, Syahyuti, Anwar K, Sudaryanto T, Gunawan E, Ariningsih E, Saptana, Ashari, et al. 2023. Technical efficiency of local rice farming in tidal swamp areas of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia: determinants and implications. Int J Des Nat Ecodynamics. 18(5):1235–1245. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.180526

Indrianti MA, Rukmana D, Demmallino EB, Jamil MH. 2023. Implementation of sustainable food and feed agricultural land regulation in Gorontalo District: a review. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 12(1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.1.9.14

Janová J, Bödeker K, Bingham L, Kindu M, Knoke T. 2024. The role of validation in optimization models for forest management. Ann For Sci. 8:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-024-01235-w

Kementerian Pertanian. 2019. Capaian pembangunan pertanian 2015-2019 mendukung kedaulatan pangan dan keberlanjutan pertanian [Internet]. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia; [diakses 2025 Des 19]. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/8461

Kumar DB. 2025. The impact of land-use changes on species diversity and ecosystem functioning in agricultural landscapes. Int J Environ Sci. 11(10s):755–765. https://doi.org/10.64252/k1ksb673

Liu C, Song C, Ye S, Cheng F, Zhang L, Li C. 2023. Estimate provincial-level effectiveness of the arable land requisition-compensation balance policy in mainland China in the last 20 years. Land Use Policy. 131(7499):106733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106733

Meyfroidt P, Börner J, Garrett R, Gardner T, Godar J, Kis-Katos K, Soares-Filho BS, Wunder S. 2020. Focus on leakage and spillovers: informing land-use governance in a tele-coupled world. Environ Res Lett. 15(9):090202. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7397

Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF. 2008. Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts. Glob Chang Biol. 14:1319–1336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01575.x

Nteranya JN, Kiplagat A, Ucakuwun EK, Kabonyi Nzabandora C. 2024. Land degradation vulnerability modelling for landscape restoration planning in Eastern DR Congo using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geospatial techniques. Geomatics, Nat Hazards Risk. 15(1):2426682. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2024.2426682

Pasandaran E. 2019. Dinamika pembangunan pertanian perspektif sejarah dan politik [Internet]. Bogor: IPB Press; [diakses 2025 Des 19]. https://digilib.brmpkementan.id/pengelolahasil/index.php?p=show_detail&id=11010&keywords=

Pribadi DO, Pauleit S. 2015. The dynamics of peri-urban agriculture during rapid urbanization of Jabodetabek Metropolitan Area. Land Use Policy. 48:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.009

Purnamasari RA, Ahamed T, Noguchi R. 2019. Land suitability assessment for cassava production in Indonesia using GIS, remote sensing and multi-criteria analysis. Asia-Pacific J Reg Sci. 3(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-018-0079-z

Rumiartha INPB. 2021. Vague norm peraturan zonasi pada perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan. Moral J Ilmu Huk. 7(1):74. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v7i1.189

Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Serv Sci. 1(1):83‒98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Sun Y, Jiang H, Zhu X. 2024. Drivers, constraints, and policy regulation strategies for the abandonment of farmland: insights from China. Land. 13(12):2096. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122096

Ustaoglu E, Williams B. 2017. Determinants of urban expansion and agricultural land conversion in 25 EU countries. Environ Manag. 60(4):717‒746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0908-2

Ustaoglu E, Williams B. 2022. Institutional settings and effects on agricultural land conversion: a global and spatial analysis of European regions. Land. 12(1):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010047

Viana CM, Freire D, Abrantes P, Rocha J, Pereira P. 2022. Agricultural land systems importance for supporting food security and sustainable development goals: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ. 806:150718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150718

Zieliński M, Gołębiewska B, Jadczyszyn J, Adamski M, Tyburski J. 2025. Importance of environmental measures under the CAP 2023–2027 on high nature value farmlands: evidence from Poland. Sustainability. 17(17):7763. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177763

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

Issue

Section

Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian

How to Cite

1.
Indrianti MA, Taslim I, Gobel YA, Djaini A, Djibran MM. Mengatasi paradoks perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan: transformasi kebijakan insentif spasial di Kabupaten Gorontalo: Addressing the paradox of food agricultural land protection: transforming spatial incentive policies in Gorontalo Regency. Analisis Kebijak. Pertan. [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Jul. 8];24(1):1-13. Available from: https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/akp/article/view/4324