Menelisik masa depan kakao berkelanjutan: menjembatani kesenjangan kesediaan membayar konsumen di Indonesia

Exploring sustainable cocoa futures: bridging the consumer willingness-to-pay gap in Indonesia

Authors

  • Wednes Aria Yuda universitas gadjah mada
  • Adi Djoko Guritno
  • Atris Suyantohadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v23.n2.2025.%25p

Keywords:

attitude–behavior gap, consumer behavior, environmental awareness, sustainable cocoa, willingness to pay, kakao berkelanjutan, kesadaran lingkungan, kesediaan membayar, perilaku konsumen

Abstract

The sustainability of cocoa agribusiness in Indonesia is hindered by consumers' unwillingness to pay more for sustainable chocolate products. Willingness to Pay (WTP) becomes important because it determines the extent to which the local market is willing to support sustainability connected to cocoa farmers' welfare upstream and premium cocoa quality. This research objective was to reveal the factors causing such reluctance and its implications for agricultural policy. The data was collected through a survey of 340 consumers and analysed using a logistic regression model. Results of this study reveal that environmental awareness, perceived benefits, and price significantly influence the main determinants of WTP, with an average of IDR 11,228 and a median of IDR 12,500. The younger generation (ages 18−24) shows the highest WTP at IDR 12,114, primarily due to the influence of social media promotions. The main factors determining WTP are environmental awareness, perception of social benefits to farmers, and price sensitivity. These findings affirm the existence of an Attitude Behavior Gap, in which awareness does not always manifest in purchasing behavior. Based on these results, it is recommended to implement an integrated policy comprising digital campaigns to increase awareness, subsidize farmers for sustainable cocoa production, and adopt a blockchain-based certification to create transparent document supply chains to address consumer trust issues regarding sustainability claims.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah DD, Irham, Mulyo JH. 2021. How does willingness and ability to pay of palm oil smallholders affect their willingness to participate in Indonesian sustainable palm oil certification? Empirical evidence from North Sumatra. Open Agric. 6(1):369–381. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2021-0019

Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bannor RK, Abele S. 2021. Consumer characteristics and incentives to buy labelled regional agricultural products. World J Entrep Manag Sustain Dev. 17(4):872–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-12-2020-0173

Bannor RK, Oppong-Kyeremeh H, Atewene S, Wongnaa CA. 2019. Influence of non-price incentives on the choice of cocoa licensed buying companies by farmers in the Western North of Ghana. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ. 9(4):402–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-11-2018-0151

Batool N, Wani MD, Shah SA, Dada ZA. 2024. Theory of planned behavior and value-belief norm theory as antecedents of pro-environmental behaviour: evidence from the local community. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 34(5):693–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2023.2205912

Beg MS, Ahmad S, Jan K, Bashir K. 2017. Status, supply chain and processing of cocoa - a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 66:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.007

Blazkova T, Pedersen ERG, Andersen KR, Rosati F. 2023. Greenwashing debates on Twitter: stakeholders and critical topics. J Clean Prod. 427(September):139260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139260

Brown AL, Bakke AJ, Hopfer H. 2020. Understanding American premium chocolate consumer perception of craft chocolate and desirable product attributes using focus groups and projective mapping. [place unknown]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240177

Camargo M, Nhantumbo I. 2016. Towards sustainable chocolate. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. [Internet}. [accessed 2025 Jul 20]. https://pubs.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/16613IIED.pdf.

Carfora V, Cavallo C, Caso D, Del Giudice T, De Devitiis B, Viscecchia R, Nardone G, Cicia G. 2019. Explaining consumer purchase behavior for organic milk: including trust and green self-identity within the theory of planned behavior. Food Qual Prefer. 76(March):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.03.006

Chen CF, Shi W, Yang J, Fu HH. 2021. Social bots' role in climate change discussion on Twitter: measuring standpoints, topics, and interaction strategies. Adv Clim Chang Res. 12(6):913–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2021.09.011

Fairtrade. 2019. Craving a change in chocolate: how to secure a living income for cocoa farmers [Internet]. [accessed 2025 July 06]. https://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.fairtrade.ie/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Craving-A-Change-In-Chocolate-Final-Single-pages.pdf

Fountain A, Huetz-Adams F. 2020. Cocoa barometer. [Internet]. [accessed 2025 Jul 06] https://www.voicenetwork.eu/2018/04/2018-cocoa-barometer-released/

García-Herrero L, De Menna F, Vittuari M. 2019. Sustainability concerns and practices in the chocolate life cycle: integrating consumers' perceptions and experts' knowledge. Sustain Prod Consum. 20:117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.06.003

Izzatin NR, Durroh B, Masahid M. 2023. Analisis daya saing ekspor kakao indonesia di pasar internasional. Agro Bali Agric J. 6(2):337–349. https://doi.org/10.37637/ab.v6i2.1266

Janssen C. 2024. The impact of sustainability labels on consumers' problem awareness, attitudes towards, and purchase behavior of sustainable chocolate. SSRN Electron J.:1–58. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4708492

Joshi Y, Rahman Z. 2019. Consumers' sustainable purchase behaviour: modeling the impact of psychological factors. Ecol Econ. 159(1270):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.025

Kementerian Perindustrian. 2020. Rencana strategis Kementrian Perindustrian tahun 2020-2024. Jakarta: Kementerian Perindustrian.

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. 2023. Keputusan Menteri Perencanaan Pembangunan Pertanian/Kepala Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional nomor Kep. 118/M.PPN/HK/08/2023 tentang peta jalan tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan tahun 2023-2030. Jakarta: Kementrian PPN/Bappenas [Internet]; [accessed 2025 Jan 2].. https://jdih.bappenas.go.id/peraturan/detailperaturan/3368

Kuźniar W, Surmacz T, Wierzbiński B. 2021. The impact of ecological knowledge on young consumers' attitudes and behaviours towards the food market. Sustain. 13(4):1984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041984

Liu C, Wu Y. 2020. The impact of value-belief-norm theory and technology acceptance model on use intention of green design packaging. Int J Bus Manag. 15(7):158. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v15n7p158

Mancini P, Marchini A, Simeone M. 2017. Which are the sustainable attributes affecting the real consumption behaviour? Consumer understanding and choices. Br Food J. 119(8):1839–1853. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2016-0574

Nguyen HV, Nguyen CH, Hoang TTB. 2019. Green consumption: closing the intention-behavior gap. Sustain Dev. 27(1):118–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1875

Nurhadi E, Hidayat SI, Indah PN, Widayanti S, Harya GI. 2019. Keberlanjutan komoditas kakao sebagai produk unggulan agroindustri dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan petani. Agriekonomika. 8(1):51. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v8i1.5017

Pham TH, Nguyen TN, Phan TTH, Nguyen NT. 2019. Evaluating the purchase behaviour of organic food by young consumers in an emerging market economy. J Strateg Mark. 27(6):540–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2018.1447984

Relawati R, Szymoniuk B, Ariadi BY, Handayanto E. 2022. Pricing strategy for the organic eggs: willingness to pay and hedonic price approaches. SOCA J Sos Ekon Pertan. 16(1):118-129. https://doi.org/10.24843/soca.2022.v16.i01.p11

Sipilä J, Tarkiainen A, Levänen J. 2024. Exploration of public discussion around sustainable consumption on social media. Resour Conserv Recycl. 204 (May 2024) : 107505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107505

Song Y, Qin Z, Yuan Q. 2019. The impact of eco-label on the young Chinese generation: The mediation role of environmental awareness and product attributes in green purchase. Sustain. 11(4): 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040973

Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel T, Guagnano GA, Kalof L. 1999. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev. 6(2):81–97.

Taufique KMR, Vocino A, Polonsky MJ. 2017. The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. J Strateg Mark. 25(7):511–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1240219

Venghaus S, Henseleit M, Belka M. 2022. The impact of climate change awareness on behavioral changes in Germany: changing minds or changing behavior? Energy Sustain Soc. 12(8): 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00334-8

Vermeir I, Weijters B, De Houwer J, Geuens M, Slabbinck H, Spruyt A, Van Kerckhove A, Van Lippevelde W, De Steur H, Verbeke W. 2020. Environmentally sustainable food consumption: a review and research agenda from a goal-directed perspective. Front Psychol. 11: 1603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01603

White K, Habib R, Hardisty DJ. 2019. How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework. J Mark. 83(3):22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649

Published

22-12-2025

How to Cite

1.
Yuda WA, Guritno AD, Suyantohadi A. Menelisik masa depan kakao berkelanjutan: menjembatani kesenjangan kesediaan membayar konsumen di Indonesia: Exploring sustainable cocoa futures: bridging the consumer willingness-to-pay gap in Indonesia. Analisis Kebijak. Pertan. [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 22 [cited 2025 Dec. 26];23(2). Available from: https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/index.php/akp/article/view/4083