Dampak pencabutan subsidi pupuk terhadap kinerja usaha tani dan efisiensi komoditas non-subsidi: studi kasus komoditas kentang dan wortel
The impact of fertilizer subsidy removal on farm performance and efficiency of non-subsidized commodities: a case study of potatoes and carrots commodities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v23.n2.2025.%25pKeywords:
production, subsidized fertilizer, technical efficiency, potatoes, carrot farmingAbstract
The enactment of the Ministry of Agriculture Regulation Number 10/2022, which, among other things, allocates subsidized fertilizer only to nine commodities, marks a new milestone in the management of subsidized fertilizer. This study aims to analyze the responses of potato and carrot farmers who do not receive subsidized fertilizer allocations regarding input use, production, nominal and real input costs, and technical efficiency. The National Farmer Panel (Patanas) data from 2017 and 2023, conducted by the Center for Agricultural Socioeconomic and Policy Studies (ICASEPS), were used. The data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive methods. The study results show that in potato and carrot farming, there has been a decrease in subsidized fertilizer use between 98-100 percent and 59-200 percent, and a decrease in production of 31.78 percent and 7.0 percent, respectively. In nominal terms, potato farming costs in 2017 and 2023 were relatively similar, but in real terms, they decreased, especially for fertilizer. At the same time, in carrot farming, input costs in nominal terms increased significantly by 99.69. In real terms, almost all input costs increased, particularly land rent and fertilizer. The withdrawal of subsidized fertilizer allocation for potato farming led to reduced fertilizer use, whereas that for carrot farming was replaced by non-subsidized fertilizer. Potato and carrot productivity decreased by 31.78 percent and 59.81 percent, and technical efficiency decreased by 30.45 percent and 22.62 percent, respectively. The results of this study indicate that government policy has had a negative impact on horticultural farming, and thus, there is a need to improve the governance of subsidized fertilizer.
Downloads
References
Agustian A, Hermanto, Kariyasa K, Friyatno S, Hidayat D. 2017. Kajian kebijakan subsidi pupuk terhadap permintaan pupuk dan produksi tanaman pangan. Bogor (ID): Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian.
Ajina H, Timisela NR, Leatemia ED. 2023. Dampak kelangkaan pupuk bersubsidi terhadap produksi dan pendapatan petani padi sawah di Desa Waimital, Kecamatan Kairatu, Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat. J Agrosilvopasture-Tech. 2(2): 288-296. https://doi.org/10.30598/j.agrosilvopasture-tech.2023.2.2.288
Akter R, Akram W. 2020. Economics of Potato Production: A case study on the farmers of munshiganj area. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR). 4(5):81–89. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341763611
Antriyandarti E, Ani SW, Ferichani M, Program SP, Agribisnis S, Pertanian F. 2012. Analisis privat dan sosial usaha tani padi di Kabupaten Grobogan. J. Sos. Ekon. Pertan. Agribis. 9(1):12–18. https://doi.org/10.20961/sepa.v9i1.48797
Arifin AM, Fariyanti A, Tinaprilla N. 2021. Efisiensi Teknis Usahatani Kentang di Kabupaten Gowa Sulawesi Selatan. Forum Agribisnis. 11(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.29244/fagb.11.1.65-74
Ashiila Y, Suminartika E. 2023. Analisis usahatani kentang di Desa Margamulya Kecamatan Pangalengan Kabupaten Bandung. J Ilm Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jimag.v10i3.11611
Aziza N. 2023. Metodologi penelitian 1. In: Haryanti S, editor. Metodologi Penelitian 1. Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia; p. 165–178.
Belete A, Setumo MP, Laurie SM, Senyolo MP. 2016. A Stochastic frontier approach to technical efficiency and marketing of Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato (OFSP) at farm level: a case study of Kwazulu-Natal Province, South Africa. Journal of Human Ecology. 53(3):257–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2016.11906979
Carolina M, Wulandari S. 2024. Evaluasi subsidi pupuk dan rencana bantuan langsung pupuk. Buletin APBN [Internet]. 9(1):3–7. www.pa3kn.dpr.go.id
Coelli TJ, Rao DP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE. 2005. Introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. second edition. New York: Springer Scince Business Media Inc.
Darwis V, Supriyati. 2014. Subsidi pupuk: kebijakan, pelaksanaan, dan optimalisasi pemanfaatannya. Anal. Kebijak. Pertan. 11:45–60. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v11i1.45-60
Giawa YY, Zulfida I, Harahap, LH. 2024. Pengaruh aplikasi pupuk NPK terhadap pertumbuhan dan produksi tanaman wortel (Daucus carota L.). J Agroplasma. 11(2):530-538. https://doi.org/10.36987/agroplasma.v11i2.6314
Irjayanti AD, Wibowo AS, Stiyaningsih H, Putri IM, Gitaningtyas OP, Areka SK, Suprapti W, Nurfalah Z. 2023. Statistik hortikultura 2022. Setiawati R, Marpaung TH, editors. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Irwansyah M, Ruliana, Aidid MK. Analisis regresi balanced panel dengan komponen galat dua arah pada kasus melek huruf masyarakat di Provinsi NTB. Journal of Statistics and Its application on Teaching and Research. 3(1):10-22. https://doi.org/10.35580/variansiunm14644
Lisnawati. 2022. Kebijakan distribusi pupuk dan permasalahannya. Info Singkat. 14(23):19–24.
Maryanto MA, Sukiyono K, Sigit Priyono B. 2018. Analisis efisiensi teknis dan faktor penentunya pada usahatani kentang (Solanumtuberosum L.) di Kota Pagar Alam, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Agrar J Agribus Rural Dev Res. 4(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.4154
Minangsih DM, Yusdian Y, Nazar A. 2022. Pengaruh dosis pupuk kandang ayam dan npk (16:16:16) terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman kentang (Solanum tuberosum l.) varietas granola. J ilm pertan AgroTatane. 4(2):17-26. https://doi.org/10.55222/agrotatanen.v4i2.820
Mulyana SE. 2015. Perubahan Tahun Dasar PDRB dari Tahun 2000 menjadi Tahun 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Nuraeni A, Khairani L, Susilawati I, Pengajar S. 2019. Pengaruh tingkat pemberian pupuk nitrogen terhadap kandungan air dan serat kasar Corchorus aestuans. Pastura. 9(1):32–35. https://doi.org/10.24843/Pastura.2019.v09.i01.p09
Nurhanifah S, Dasipah E, Nataliningsih, Sukmawati D, Permana NS, Sondari N. 2022. Analisis usaha dan faktor-faktor produksi yang mempengaruhi usahatani wortel (Daucus carota L) di Kabupaten Sukabumi (Suatu Kasus di Kelompok Tani Kecamatan Sukabumi Kabupaten Sukabumi). Orchid Agri. 2(2):48–61. https://doi.org/10.35138/orchidagri.v2i2.432
Sapkota SC, Raj Rokaya P, Acharya H, Uprety S. 2019. An economic analysis of potato production in AchhaM District of Nepal. International Journal of Horticulture & Agriculture. 4(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.15226/2572-3154/4/2/00131
Setiawan AB, Inayati C. 2020. The analysis of production factors andincome of potato farming. Jejak. 13(1): 17-29. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v13i1.21965
Srinivas T, Rizvi S, Aw-Hassan A, Manan A, Kadian M. 2012. Technical efficiency of seed potato farmers Of Badakshan Province Of Afghanistan. [place unknown].
Sumaryanto, Susilowati SH. 2022. Rasionalitas kisaran harga pupuk urea dan NPK pada usaha tani padi. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 20(2): 173-191 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v20n2.2022.173-191
Yulitasari D, Pramastiwi FE, Situmorang S. 2022. Analisis struktur biaya, pendapatan dan risiko usahatani wortel Di Kecamatan Balik Bukit Kabupaten Lampung Barat. J Ilm Mahasiswa AGROINFO GALUH. 9(3): 1273-1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jimag.v9i3.8396
Viana JDS, Palaretti LF, de Faria RT, Delgado Y V., Dalri AB, Barbosa J de A. 2020. Potato production affected by fertilization methods, masses of seed tubers and water regimes. Hortic Bras. 38(2):166–174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-053620200209
