MENGUKUR KESEJAHTERAAN PETANI BERDASARKAN INDEKS KAPABILITAS MASYARAKAT: STUDI KASUS DI KECAMATAN AMPEK ANGKEK, KABUPATEN AGAM

Authors

  • Marlina Wirmas
  • Retno Widodo Dwi Pramono

Keywords:

aset, assets, community capability index, development evaluation, evaluasi pembangunan, farmers welfare, indeks kapabilitas masyarakat, kesejahteraan petani

Abstract

English
Economic welfare paradigm has generated productivity-based agricultural policy which lead to widening inequality due to less consideration on developmental aspects. This study aims to measure welfare using a capability approach that treats human freedom as the center of evaluation. Assessment is conducted by measuring the level of availability and functioning of assets to quantify Community Capability Index (CCI) representing the degree of freedom. This research was conducted in Ampek Angkek subdistrict, Agam Regency by sending questionnaires to qualified farmers to rate some indicators consist of 51 listed assets from five groups. The analysis revealed that on average, the available assets have sufficient quality and can provide functionings in farmers livelihood. However, the degree of freedom was still quite low and caused limitation of certain functionings. Several assets related to financial and intellectual human capital were in low quality and thus had negative implications in farming business development functionings. Advantages in natural-environment, public services and infrastructures, and basic human capital are the potentials to be further developed. Programs to increasing access to financial capital and enhancing human capital quality are necessary to improve their functioning and gaining higher freedom that led to a more prosperous life.

Indonesian
Paradigma kesejahteraan berbasis ekonomi menciptakan kebijakan pertanian yang mengutamakan produktivitas. Namun, pendekatan ini mengakibatkan ketimpangan yang semakin lebar karena kurangnya pertimbangan terhadap aspek-aspek pembangunan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur kesejahteraan petani menggunakan pendekatan kapabilitas yang memandang kebebasan manusia dalam melakukan dan menjadi sesuatu sebagai aspek utama evaluasi. Penilaian dilakukan dengan menilai tingkat ketersediaan dan kebermanfaatan serangkaian aset sebagai komponen untuk menghitung Indeks Kapabilitas Masyarakat (CCI) sebagai representasi tingkat kebebasan. Penelitian dilakukan di Kecamatan Ampek Angkek, Kabupaten Agam, Sumatera Barat dengan memberikan kuesioner kepada petani berisikan penilaian terhadap 51 jenis aset dari lima kategori. Hasil analisis menunjukkan secara rata-rata, aset yang tersedia memiliki kualitas cukup dan memberikan fungsi dalam kehidupan petani, namun derajat kebebasan masih cukup rendah dan berdampak kepada keterbatasan dalam kebermanfaatan tertentu. Beberapa aset pada modal finansial dan modal manusia intelektual masih berkualitas kurang baik dan berimplikasi kepada hambatan untuk kebermanfaatan dalam hal pengembangan usaha tani yang lebih produktif. Keunggulan pada kualitas lingkungan, layanan dan infrastruktur publik, serta modal manusia dasar menjadi potensi yang dapat dikembangkan lebih lanjut. Terhadap hasil tersebut, maka program yang bertujuan untuk memperluas dan memudahkan akses terhadap pem-biayaan, serta peningkatan kompetensi modal manusia sangat dibutuhkan untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan petani.

Author Biographies

Marlina Wirmas

Magister Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Departemen Teknik Arsitektur dan Perencanaan,
Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jln. Grafika No. 2, Sekip, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281

Retno Widodo Dwi Pramono

Magister Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Departemen Teknik Arsitektur dan Perencanaan,
Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jln. Grafika No. 2, Sekip, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281

References

Alkire S. 2016. The capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy [Internet]. Adler MD, Fleurbaey M, editors. Oxford; [cited 2021 Apr 4]. Available from: https://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ophiwp094.pdf. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.18.

Sen A. 2001. Development as freedom. UK ed. edition (US): OUP Oxford

Aminda FR, Sinaga BM, Fariyanti A. 2018. Dampak faktor eksternal terhadap kesejahteraan rumah tangga petani Tebu Keprasan di Jawa Tengah. J Agro Ekon [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 5]; 35(2):127-150. Available from: http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/jae/article/view/7938. doi: 10.21082/jae.v35n2.2017.127-150.

Bappeda Sumbar. 2018. Kawasan agropolitan di Provinsi Sumatera Barat [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 6]. Available from: https://bappeda.sumbarprov.go.id/home/news/4-kawasan-agropolitan-di-provinsi-sumatera-barat.html

Bappenas. 2004. Pelaksanaan REPELITA II: Lampiran pidato kenegaraan presiden Republik Indonesia di depan Sidang Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat tahun 1979. Jakarta (ID): Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Barry PJ, Robison LJ. 2001. Agricultural finance: credit, credit constraints, and consequences. In: Gardner BL, Rausser GC, editors. Handbook of Agricultural Economics Volume 1A: Agricultural Production. Amsterdam (NL): North Holland.

Bhandari H, Yasunobu K. 2009. What is Social Capital? A Comprehensive Review of the Concept. Asian J Soc Sci [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 1]; 37(3):480–510. Available from: https://brill.com/view/journals/ajss/37/3/article-p480_12.xml. doi: 10.1163/ 156853109x436847.

Booth A. 2000. Poverty and inequality in The Soeharto Era: an assessment. Bull Indones Econ Stud [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 3]; 36(1):73–104. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00074910012331337793.

BPP Kecamatan Ampek Angkek. 2019. Profil Balai Penyuluh Pertanian Kecamatan Ampek Angkek. Agam (ID): Balai Penyuluh Pertanian Kecamatan Ampek Angkek.

BPS. 2018a. Hasil Survei Pertanian Antar Sensus (SUTAS) 2018. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik.

BPS. 2018b. Produk domestik regional bruto provinsi-provinsi di Indonesia menurut lapangan usaha 2014-2018. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik.

Brown LD. 1985. People-centered development and participatory research. Harvard Edu Rev [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 6]; 55(1):69–76. Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/her/article/55/1/69/31390/peoplecentered-development-and-participatory. doi: 10.17763/ haer.55.1.r07478n215287101.

Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. 1989. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D. The Econ J [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 7]; 99(397):569. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ej/article/99/397/569-596/5188256. doi: 10.2307/2233763.

Dakhli M, De Clercq D. 2004. Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 4]; 16(2):107–128. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08985620410001677835. doi: 10.1080/08985620410001677835.

Damayanthi R V. 2008. Proses Industrialisasi di Indonesia dalam Prespektif Ekonomi Politik. J Indones Applied Econ [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 15]; 2(1):1–2008. Available from: http://jiae.ub.ac.id/index.php/jiae/article/view/149. doi: 10.21776/ ub.jiae.2008.002.01.3.

Daryanto A. 2012. Memposisikan secara tepat pembangunan pertanian dalam perspektif pembangunan nasional. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Petani dan Pembangunan Pertanian; 2011 October 12; Jakarta, Indonesia [Internet]. Bogor (ID): Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian; [cited 2021 May 4]; p. 26–46. Available from: https://pse.litbang.pertanian.go.id/ind/pdffiles/pros_2012_02_mu_arief.pdf

Depkimpraswil. 2003. Depkimpraswil bangun PSD [Internet]. [cited 2021 Aug 7]. Available from: https://www.pu.go.id/berita/depkimpraswil-bangun-psd

Desfiyani S. 2014. Analisa pengaruh kredit lembaga keuangan mikro agribisnis terhadap usahatani mentimun (Cucumis Sativa) di Kecamatan Payakumbuh Timur Kota Payakumbuh [Skripsi]. [Padang (ID)]: Universitas Andalas.

Devkota PL. 1970. People-centered development in Nepal: An innovative approach. Occasional Papers in Sociology and Anthropology [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 7]; 6:26–40. Available from: https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/opsa/article/view/1100. doi: 10.3126/opsa.v6i0.1100.

Disperta Agam. 2018. Rencana strategis Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Agam 2016-2021. Lubuk Basung (ID): Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Agam.

Fallo FAI, Sinaga BM, Hartoyo S, Simatupang P. 2018. Dampak alokasi bantuan modal dan tenaga kerja keluarga terhadap kesejahteraan rumah tangga petani di Nusa Tenggara Timur. J Agro Ekon [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 16]; 36(2):113. Available from: http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/jae/article/view/9114. doi: 10.21082/ jae.v36n2.2018.113-134.

Frediani AA, Julia H, editors. 2015. The capability approach in development planning and urban design. London (UK): Development Planning Unit, University College London.

Gébert J, Bajmocy Z, Málovics G. 2017. How to evaluate local economic development projects from a people-centred perspective? An analytical framework based on the capability approach. DETUROPE [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 18]; 9:4–24. Available from: http://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/id/eprint/2716/3/tézisfüzet angol.pdf

Ghani E. 2013. How to Avoid Middle Income Traps? World Bank Blogs [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 29]. Available from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/how-avoid-middle-income-traps

Guswardi Y. 2020. Pengaruh kredit terhadap usahatani padi anggota LKM-A Pincuran Bonjo di Kelurahan Padang Alai Bodi Kecamatan Payakumbuh Timur Kota Payakumbuh [Skripsi]. [Padang (ID)]: Universitas Andalas.

Huffman WE. 2001. Chapter 7 Human capital: education and agriculture. In: Handbook of Agricultural Economics Volume 1A: Agricultural Production [Internet]. Amsterdam; [cited 2021 May 18]; p. 333–381. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/s1574007201100101

Jamal E. 2009. Membangun momentum baru pembangunan pedesaan di Indonesia. J Penelit dan Pengembang Pertan [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 20]; 28(1):7–14. Available from: http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/jppp/article/view/7765. doi: 10.21082/jp3.v28n1.2009.p7.

Kasmadiharja H, Hadi S, Sjaf S. 2016. Arahan pengembangan kawasan agropolitan berbasis komoditas sayuran unggulan di Kabupaten Agam [Internet]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor; [cited 2021 May 20]. Available from: https://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/81209

Korten DC. 1984. Strategic organization for people-centered development. Public Administration Review [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 8]; 44(4):341. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/976080?origin=crossref. doi: 10.2307/976080.

Li Y, Westlund H, Liu Y. 2019. Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. J Rural Stud [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 10]; 68:135–143. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/s07 4301671830929x. doi: 10.1016/ j.jrurstud.2019.03.003.

Llanto GM. 2012. The impact of infrastructure on agricultural productivity [Internet]. Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS); [cited 2021 May 11]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/126883

Martina M, Praza R. 2018. Analisis Tingkat Kesejahteraan Petani Padi Sawah Di Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Agrifo : J Agribis Universitas Malikussaleh [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 29]; 3(2):27. Available from: http://ojs.unimal.ac.id/index.php/agrifo/article/view/1109. doi: 10.29103/ ag.v3i2.1109.

Migheli M. 2011. Capabilities and Functionings: The Role of Social Capital for Accessing New Capabilities. Rev Politic Econ [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 7]; 23(1):133–142. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09538259.2011.526297.

Mustika L. 2019. Identifikasi karakteristik sosial ekonomi dan tingkat kehidupan petani padi sawah di Desa Rantau Kecamatan Lintang, Kanan Kabupaten Empat Lawang [Skripsi]. [Palembang (ID)]: Universitas Sriwijaya.

Pramono R, Nurfajrina IA, Nariswari N. 2019. Aspek-aspek pembentuk kualitas tempat berdasarkan survei kapabilitas: Determinan bagi kebahagiaan masyarakat. TATALOKA [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]; 21(1):153. Available from: https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/2770. doi: 10.14710/tataloka.21.1.153-169.

Pramono RWD. 2016. Capability Approach for well-being Evaluation in Regional Development Planning: Case Study in Magelang Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Yogyakarta.

Pramono RWD. 2020. Evaluasi dan Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah dengan Pendekatan Kapabilitas. Sleman (ID): Deepublish.

Putterman L. 2013. Institutions, social capability, and economic growth. Econ Systems [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 13] 37(3):345–353. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/s0939362513000344. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2012.12.002.

Rachmat M. 2013. Nilai tukar petani : konsep, pengukuran dan relevansinya sebagai indikator kesejahteraan petani. Forum penelit Agro Ekon [Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 30] 31(2):111. Available from: http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/fae/article/view/3833. doi: 10.21082/ fae.v31n2.2013.111-122.

Rahayu DT, Tou HJ, Wahyudi WW. 2021. Identifikasi tingkat kesejahteraan keluarga petani padi di Desa Sungai Tutung Kecamatan Air Hangat Timur Kabupaten Kerinci [Tugas Akhir]. [Padang (ID)]: Universitas Bung Hatta.

Robeyns I. 2017. Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: The capability approach re-examined. 1st editio. Cambridge (UK): Open Book Publisher. doi: 10.11647/obp.0130. doi: 10.11647/obp.0130.

Robeyns I, Byskov MF. 2021. The capability approach [Internet]. Zalta EN, editor. [place unknown]: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University; [cited 2021 Nov 28]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/capability-approach/

Sen A. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York (US): Anchor Books.

Sinuraya JF, Sinaga BM, Oktaviani R, Hutabarat B. 2018. Dampak kebijakan pajak ekspor dan tarif impor terhadap kesejahteraan produsen dan konsumen kakao di Indonesia. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 1] 35(1):11. Available from: http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/jae/article/view/8532. doi: 10.21082/ jae.v35n1.2017.11-31.

Subroto ZW, Sapha D. 2016. Pengaruh infrastruktur terhadap sektor pertanian di Pulau Sumatera. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekon Pembangun [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 28] 1(2):598–610. Available from: http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/ekp/article/view/5854

Suradisastra K. 2017. Revitalisasi kelembagaan untuk percepatan pembangunan sektor pertanian dalam otonomi daerah. Anal Kebijak Pertan [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 28] 4(4):281–315. Available from: http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/akp/article/ view/5370. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/ akp.v4n4.2006.281-315.

Suwardi A. 2011. Pengeluaran pemerintah daerah, produktivitas pertanian, dan kemiskinan di Indonesia. J Ekon Pembangun Indones [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 15] 12(1):39–55. Available from: https://jepi.fe.ui.ac.id/index.php/jepi/article/view/287.

Swastika DKS. 2014. Reformasi paradigma urbanisasi: strategi percepatan pengentasan kemiskinan di perdesaan. In: Haryono, Pasandaran E, Rachmat M, Mardianto S, Sumedi, Salim HP, Heriadi A, editors. Reformasi Kebijakan Menuju Transformasi Pembangunan Pertanian. Jakarta (ID): IAARD Press, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian; p. 357–383.

Tan E. 2014. Human Capital Theory. Review of Educational Research [Internet]. [cited 2021 May 8] 84(3):411–445. Available from: http:// journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654314532696.

Yunelimeta. 2008. Pembangunan pedesaan dalam konteks agropolitan, desentralisasi dan otonomi daerah di Indonesia, studi kasus Daerah Minangkabau-Sumatera Barat [Tesis]. [Semarang (ID)]: Universitas Diponegoro.

Zaika S, Gridin O. 2020. Human capital development in the agricultural economy sector. Technology audit and production reserves [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 20] 1(4(51)):30–36. Available from: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/194444. doi: 10.15587/2312-8372.2020.194444.

Downloads

Published

01-02-2024