PENINGKATAN KAPASITAS KEMITRAAN UNTUK MENDORONG RANTAI NILAI KOMODITAS KOPI YANG BERKELANJUTAN
Keywords:
certification, coffee, governance, partnership, standardization, value chain, kemitraan, kopi, rantai nilai, standardisasi, sertifikasi, tata kelolaAbstract
Coffee is one of the world's most traded agricultural commodities, but sustainability in its value chain remains an issue. While governments, companies, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play a strategic role in the value chain, the gatekeepers of sustainability, namely coffee farmers, have a weak position. Cross-sector partnerships have the potential to serve as an innovative mechanism to address sustainability issues in coffee value chains by changing the relationships between key actors in the chain to make them more equitable and mutually beneficial. However, the capacity of partnerships to do this empirically is still unknown, especially when linked to the farmer context. This paper uses a literature review method to analyze partnership capacity from the perspectives of governance and development studies. The results of the review show that the governance perspective sees partnerships as initiators and agents of change in the coffee value chain. On the other hand, the development perspective critically views partnerships driven by businesses and NGOs still having ambiguous impacts on farmers. As part of the neoliberal agenda, partnership seems unable to provide solutions to various gaps in the coffee value chain. Thus, the partnership needs to be improved by adopting a more inclusive business model that involves all stakeholders and is built with a bottom-up perspective that considers the local situation and context.
References
C Association. 2019. Langkah demi langkah 4C: jalan untuk bergabung dengan sistem 4C. [diunduh 2023 Juli 14]. Tersedia dari: https://www.4c-services.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/4C-Unit-Certification_Step-by-Step_ID.pdf.
Akoyi KT, Maertens M. 2018. Walk the talk: private sustainability standards in the Ugandan coffee sector. J Dev Stud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 54(10):1792–1818. Available from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/524942. doi:10.1080/00220388.2017.1327663.
Alexander R. 2020. Emerging roles of lead buyer governance for sustainability across global production networks. J Bus Ethics [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 12]; 162(2):269–290. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-019-04199-4.pdf. doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04199-4.
Arnold N. 2022. Accountability in transnational governance: the partial organization of voluntary sustainability standards in long-term account-giving. Regul Gov [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 06]; 16(2):375–391. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/rego.12357. doi:10.1111/rego.12357.
Arslan A, Golgeci I, Khan Z, Al-Tabbaa O, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P. 2021. Adaptive learning in cross-sector collaboration during global emergency: conceptual insights in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Multinatl Bus Rev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 28]; 29(1):21–42. Available from: https://osuva.uwasa.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/13045/Osuva_Arslan_Golgeci_Khan_Al-Tabbaa_Hurmelinna-Laukkanen_2021.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y. doi:10.1108/MBR-07-2020-0153.
Bager SL, Lambin EF. 2020. Sustainability strategies by companies in the global coffee sector. Bus Strateg Environ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 27]; 29(8):3555–3570. Available from: doi:10.1002/bse.2596.
Barreto Peixoto JA, Silva JF, Oliveira MBPP, Alves RC. 2023. Sustainability issues along the coffee chain: From the field to the cup. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf [Internet]. [cited 2024 March 22]; 22(1):287–332. Available from: doi:10.1111/1541-4337.13069.
Barzola Iza CL, Dentoni D, Omta OSWF. 2020. The influence of multi-stakeholder platforms on farmers’ innovation and rural development in emerging economies: a systematic literature review. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 14]; 10(1):13–39. Available from: doi:10.1108/JADEE-12-2018-0182.
Bermudez S, Vivek Voora V, Larrea C, Voora V, Larrea C. 2022. Global market report: coffee prices and sustainability [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 24]; Winnipeg (Canada): International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep47318.
Birkland TA, Schwaeble KL. 2019. Agenda setting and the policy process: focusing events [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 24]; Oxford Res Encycl Polit. Available from: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-165.
Bitzer V, Glasbergen P. 2015. Business–NGO partnerships in global value chains: part of the solution or part of the problem of sustainable change? Curr Opin Environ Sustain [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 20]; 12:35–40. Available from: https://www.conservationfinancealliance.org/s/Business-NGOs_ENG.pdf
Bitzer V, Glasbergen P, Arts B. 2013. Exploring the potential of intersectoral partnerships to improve the position of farmers in global agrifood chains: findings from the coffee sector in Peru. Agric Human Values [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 30(1):5–20. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-012-9372-z. doi: 10.1007/s10460-012-9372-z.
Bitzer V, Schouten G. 2023. Out of balance: Global–local tensions in multi-stakeholder partnerships and the emergence of rival initiatives in producing countries. Organ Environ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 36(3):387–410. doi: 10.1177/10860266221117231.
Brun A, Karaosman H, Barresi T. 2020. Supply chain collaboration for transparency. Sustain [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 12(11):4429. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4429/pdf. doi:10.3390/su12114429.
Calton JM. 2011. Global action networks: creating our future together. Sustain Accounting, Manag Policy J [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 16]; 2(1):175–180. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/20408021111162218/full/html. doi:10.1108/20408021111162218.
Candelo E, Casalegno C, Civera C, Mosca F. 2018. Turning farmers into business partners through value co-creation projects. Insights from the Coffee Supply Chain. Sustainability [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 16]; 10(4). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1018/pdf. doi:10.3390/su10041018.
Carroll AB, Brown JA. 2018. Corporate social responsibility: A review of current concepts, research, and issues. Corp Soc Responsib [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 17]; 2:39–69. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2514-175920180000002002/full/html. doi:10.1108/S2514-175920180000002002.
Casady CB, Eriksson K, Levitt RE, Scott WR. 2020. (Re) defining public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the new public governance (NPG) paradigm: an institutional maturity perspective. Public Manag Rev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 18]; 22(2):161–183. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577909?scroll=top&needAccess=true. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1577909
Cashore B, Knudsen JS, Moon J, van der Ven H. 2021. Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: governance spheres for problem solving. Regul Gov [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 14]; 15(4):1166–1182. Available from: https://research.cbs.dk/files/71094780/benjamin_cashore_et_al_private_authority_and_public_policy_interactions_in_global_context_acceptedversion.pdf. doi:10.1111/rego.12395.
Choiruzzad SAB, Tyson A, Varkkey H. 2021. The ambiguities of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil certification: internal incoherence, governance rescaling and state transformation. Asia Eur J [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 13]; 19(2):189–208. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-020-00593-0.pdf. doi:10.1007/s10308-020-00593-0.
d’Albertas F, Ruggiero P, Pinto LFG, Sparovek G, Metzger JP. 2023. Agricultural certification as a complementary tool for environmental law compliance. Biol Conserv [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 11]; 277:109847. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320722004001. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109847.
Delmas MA, Gergaud O. 2021. Sustainable practices and product quality: is there value in eco-label certification? the case of wine. Ecol Econ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 10]; 183:106953. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800921000112. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106953.
Dentoni D, Bitzer V, Schouten G. 2018. Harnessing wicked problems in multi-stakeholder partnerships. J Bus Ethics [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 28]; 150(2):333–356. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6.pdf. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6.
Dietz T, Estrella Chong A, Grabs J, Kilian B. 2020. How effective is multiple certification in improving the economic conditions of smallholder farmers? evidence from an impact evaluation in Colombia’s coffee belt. J Dev Stud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 56(6):1141–1160. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00220388.2019.1632433?scroll=top&needAccess=true. doi:10.1080/00220388.2019.1632433.
Dietz T, Grabs J. 2022. Additionality and implementation gaps in voluntary sustainability standards. New Polit Econ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 23]; 27(2):203–224. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881473?scroll=top&needAccess=true. doi:10.1080/13563467.2021.1881473.
Dietz T, Grabs J, Chong AE. 2021. Mainstreamed voluntary sustainability standards and their effectiveness: evidence from the Honduran coffee sector. Regul Gov [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 23]; 15(2):333–355. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/rego.12239. doi:10.1111/rego.12239.
Doh JP, Tashman P, Benischke MH. 2019. Adapting to grand environmental challenges through collective entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Perspect [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 33(4):450–468. Available from: https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amp.2017.0056. doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0056.
Elhakim SK, Leovita A. 2020. Model penguatan kelembagaan asosiasi kopi Minang Sumatera Barat menuju manajemen inovasi dalam memperkuat kearifan lokal. J Agrimanex Agribusiness, Rural Manag Dev Ext [Internet]. [disitasi 2024 Jan 20]; 1(1). Tersedia dari: https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/agrimanex/article/download/4751/2560
Fischer EF, Victor B, Asturias de Barrios L. 2021. Quality versus solidarity: third wave coffee and cooperative values among smallholding Maya farmers in Guatemala. J Peasant Stud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 03]; 48(3):640–657. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150.2019.1694511. doi:10.1080/03066150.2019.1694511.
Florini A, Pauli M. 2018. Collaborative governance for the sustainable development goals. Asia Pacific Policy Stud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 22]; 5(3):583–598. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/app5.252. doi:10.1002/app5.252.
Fouilleux E, Loconto A. 2017. Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: a tripartite model of techno-politics. Agric Human Values [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 22]; 34(1):1–14. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-016-9686-3. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9686-3.
Gallo PJ, Sosa S, Velez-Calle A. 2023. Business for peace: How entrepreneuring contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 16. BRQ Bus Res Q [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 21]; 26(1):62–78. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/23409444221118097. doi: 10.1177/23409444221118097.
Gather J, Wollni M. 2022. Setting the standard: Does rainforest alliance certification increase environmental and socio-economic outcomes for small-scale coffee producers in Rwanda? Appl Econ Perspect Policy [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 24]; 44(4):1807–1825. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/aepp.13307. doi:10.1002/aepp.13307.
Glasbergen P. 2018. Smallholders do not eat certificates. Ecol Econ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 08]; 147:243–252. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800917314520. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.023.
Global Coffee Platform/GCP. 2017. 4C Baseline common code v.2.1 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 18]; Available from: http://www.globalcoffeeplatform.org/assets/files/GCP_Doc_01_Baseline-Common-Code_v2.1_en.pdf.
Grabs J. 2020. Assessing the institutionalization of private sustainability governance in a changing coffee sector. Regul Gov [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 02]; 14(2):362–387. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rego.12212. doi:10.1111/rego.12212.
Grabs J, Carodenuto SL. 2021. Traders as sustainability governance actors in global food supply chains: a research agenda. Bus Strateg Environ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 20]; 30(2):1314–1332. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bse.2686. doi:10.1002/bse.2686.
Grashuis J, Skevas T. 2023. What is the benefit of membership in farm producer organizations? the case of coffee producers in Peru. Ann Public Coop Econ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 21]; 94(2):423–443. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/apce.12390.
Di Gregorio M, Fatorelli L, Paavola J, Locatelli B, Pramova E, Nurrochmat DR, May PH, Brockhaus M, Sari IM, Kusumadewi SD. 2019. Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 54:64–77. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378018304242. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003.
Hahn T, Pinkse J, Preuss L, Figge F. 2015. Tensions in corporate sustainability: towards an integrative framework. J Bus Ethics [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 127(2):297–316. Available from: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63990/1/JBE_2015_Framework_Tensions_Final.pdf. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.
Hajjar R, Newton P, Adshead D, Bogaerts M, Maguire-Rajpaul VA, Pinto LFG, McDermott CL, Milder JC, Wollenberg E, Agrawal A. 2019. Scaling up sustainability in commodity agriculture: transferability of governance mechanisms across the coffee and cattle sectors in Brazil. J Clean Prod [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 23]; 206:124–132. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618328221. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.102.
Hermans F, Geerling-Eiff F, Potters J, Klerkx L. 2019. Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics. NJAS - Wageningen J Life Sci [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 24]; 88:76–95. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573521418300332. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2018.10.001.
van Hille I, de Bakker FGA, Ferguson JE, Groenewegen P. 2019. Navigating tensions in a cross-sector social partnership: how a convener drives change for sustainability. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 25]; 26(2):317–329. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/csr.1684. doi:10.1002/csr.1684.
van Hille I, de Bakker FGA, Ferguson JE, Groenewegen P. 2020. Cross-sector partnerships for sustainability: how mission-driven conveners drive change in national coffee platforms. Sustain [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 12(7):2846. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2846/pdf. doi:10.3390/su12072846.
Hodge GA, Greve C. 2017. On public–private partnership performance: A contemporary review. Public Work Manag Policy [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 22(1):55–78. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1087724X16657830
Horner R. 2020. Towards a new paradigm of global development? beyond the limits of international development. Prog Hum Geogr [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 44(3):415–436. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309132519836158
Humphreys D, Singer B, Lawlor K, Smith R, Budds J, Gabay M, Bhagwat S, de Jong W, Newing H, Cross C, et al. 2019. SDG 17: partnerships for the goals-focus on forest finance and partnerships. Sustain Dev Goals Their Impacts for People [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 10]; 541–576. Available from: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/72245/1/sdg_17_partnerships_for_the_goals_focus_on_forest_finance_and_partnerships.pdf. doi:10.1017/9781108765015.019.
Ibnu M. 2017. Gatekeepers of Sustainability: on coffee smallholders, standards and certifications in Indonesia [Dissertation]. [Maastricht (ND)]: Maastricht University.
Ibnu M. 2019. Determinan partisipasi petani kopi dalam standar dan sertifikasi berkelanjutan Common Code for Coffee Community (4C). J Tanam Ind dan Penyegar [Internet]. [disitasi 2023 Des 22]; 6(3):135. Tersedia dari: http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/17678/. doi:10.21082/jtidp. v6n3.2019.p135-144.
Ibnu M. 2022. A systemic approach for a sustainable coffee production in Indonesia. SOCA J Sos Ekon Pertan [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 16(1):15. Available from: http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/42364/1/SOCA.pdf. doi:10.24843/soca. 2022.v16.i01.p02.
Ibnu M, Offermans A, Glasbergen P. 2018. Certification and farmer organisation: Indonesian smallholder perceptions of benefits. Bull Indones Econ Stud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 54(3):387–415. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00074918.2018.1506093. doi:10.1080/00074918.2018.1506093.
Ibnu M, Offermans A, Glasbergen P. 2020. Toward a more sustainable coffee production. Pelita Perkeb (a Coffee Cocoa Res Journal) [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 35(3):212–229. Available from: https://mail.ccrjournal.com/index.php/ccrj/article/download/361/391 doi: 10.22302/iccri.jur.pelitaperkebunan.v35i3.361.
Ingram V, van Rijn F, Waarts Y, Gilhuis H. 2018. The impacts of cocoa sustainability initiatives in West Africa. Sustain [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 10(11):4249. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4249/pdf. doi:10.3390/su10114249.
Islam MA, Deegan C, Haque S. 2021. Corporate human rights performance and moral power: a study of retail MNCs’ supply chains in Bangladesh. Crit Perspect Account [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 74:102163. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1045235420300162. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102163
de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. 2020. Using agriculture for development: supply-and demand-side approaches. World Dev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 133:105003. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X20301297. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105003
Kangile JR, Kadigi RMJ, Mgeni CP, Munishi BP, Kashaigili J, Munishi PKT. 2021. Dynamics of coffee certifications in producer countries: re-examining the tanzanian status, challenges and impacts on livelihoods and environmental conservation. Agric [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 11(10):931. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/10/931/pdf. doi:10.3390/agriculture11100931.
Koopmans ME, Rogge E, Mettepenningen E, Knickel K, Šūmane S. 2018. The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development. J Rural Stud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 59:252–262. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S074301671630211X. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.012.
KPMG Sustainability. 2013. Improving smallholder livelihoods: Effectiveness of certification in coffee, cocoa and cotton [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 22]; Sustaineo, Germany. Available from: http://s2pkp.fp.unila.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Improving-smallholder-livelihoods-Effectiveness-of-certification-in-coffeecocoa-and-cotton_study-commissioned-by-SUSTAINEO.pdf
Lambin EF, Thorlakson T. 2018. Sustainability standards: Interactions between private actors, civil society, and governments. Annu Rev Environ Resour [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 43:369–393. Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025931. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025931.
Langford NJ. 2019. The governance of social standards in emerging markets: an exploration of actors and interests shaping trustea as a Southern multi-stakeholder initiative. Geoforum [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 104:81–91. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016718519301964. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.009.
Lie AL. 2021. ‘We are not a partnership’–constructing and contesting legitimacy of global public–private partnerships: the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) movement. Globalizations [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 18(2):237–255. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14747731.2020.1770038. doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1770038.
Marques JC, Eberlein B. 2021. Grounding transnational business governance: a political-strategic perspective on government responses in the Global South. Regul Gov [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 15(4):1209–1229. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rego.12356. doi:10.1111/rego.12356.
Martel A, Reilly-King F, Baruah B. 2021. Next generation of knowledge partnerships for global development. Introduction / Prochaine génération de partenariat de savoir pour le développement global. Introduction. Can J Dev Stud [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 42(3):253–273. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02255189.2021.1919065. doi:10.1080/02255189.2021.1919065.
Martos-Pedrero A, Cortés-García FJ, Jiménez-Castillo D. 2019. The relationship between social responsibility and business performance: an analysis of the agri-food sector of southeast Spain. Sustain [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 11(22):6390. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6390/pdf. doi:10.3390/su11226390.
Marx A. 2019. Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: exploring their design and its impact on effectiveness. Sustain [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 11(4):1087. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1087/pdf. doi:10.3390/su11041087.
McHugh MC, Harvey JB, Aseyev D, Alexander JA, Beich J, Scanlon DP. 2012. Approaches to improving healthcare delivery by multi-stakeholder alliances. Am J Manag Care [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 18(6 Suppl): S156. Available from: http://ajmc.s3.amazonaws.com/_media/_pdf/A413_12sep_McHugh_S156to62.pdf
Morisson A, Doussineau M. 2019. Regional innovation governance and place-based policies: design, implementation and implications. Reg Stud Reg Sci [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 6(1):101–116. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21681376.2019.1578257. doi:10.1080/21681376.2019.1578257.
Mousavi S, Bossink B. 2020. Corporate-NGO partnership for environmentally sustainable innovation: lessons from a cross-sector collaboration in aviation biofuels. Environ Innov Soc Transitions [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 34:80–95. Available from: https://research.vu.nl/files/229573774/Corporate_NGO_partnership_for_environmentally_sustainable_innovation.pdf
Naegele H. 2020. Where does the fair trade money go? how much consumers pay extra for fair trade coffee and how this value is split along the value chain. World Dev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 133:105006. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/191910/1/1048609618.pdf. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105006.
Navarrete-Cruz A, Birkenberg A, Birner R. 2020. Factors influencing the development of rural producer organizations in post-war settings. The case of coffee growers associations in Southern Tolima, Colombia. Int J Commons [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 14(1). Available from: https://thecommonsjournal.org/articles/10.5334/ijc.1028.doi: 10.5334/ijc.1028.
Nguyen GNT, Sarker T. 2018. Sustainable coffee supply chain management: a case study in Buon Me Thuot City, Daklak, Vietnam. Int J Corp Soc Responsib [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 3(1):1–17. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40991-017-0024-x.pdf. doi:10.1186/s40991-017-0024-x.
OECD. 2007. Promoting pro-poor growth. Agriculture [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 05]; Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/green-development/43514554.pdf
Parker DW, Dressel U, Chevers D, Zeppetella L. 2018. Agency theory perspective on public-private-partnerships: international development project. Int J Product Perform Manag [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 67(2):239–259. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/478627387.pdf. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0191.
Partzsch L, Hartung K, Lümmen J, Zickgraf C. 2021. Water in your coffee? accelerating SDG 6 through voluntary certification programs. J Clean Prod [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 324:129252. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621034387. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129252.
Pattberg P, Biermann F, Chan C, Mert A. 2012. Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: emergence, influence and legitimacy. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Paunov C, Planes-Satorra S. 2019. How are digital technologies changing innovation? evidence from agriculture, the automotive industry and retail. Oecd Sci Technol Ind Policy Pap [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 11]; Nr. 74(74):1–53. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/67bbcafe-en.pdf?expires=1667737958&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=7CAF3454B84F5ED7C3E426B8EFF0EB35.
Pfisterer S, Van Tulder R. 2021. Governing partnerships for development in post-conflict settings: evidence from a longitudinal case study in Colombia. Bus Ethics, Environ Responsib [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 30(S1):44–60. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/beer.12278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12278.
Prihandono I, Relig FH. 2019. International certification as a mechanism for protecting the human rights of Indonesian coffee farmers. Environ Policy Law [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 49(1):49–54. Available from: https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/envpola49§ion=15. doi:10.3233/EPL-190125.
Pronti A, Coccia M. 2020. Agroecological and conventional agricultural systems: comparative analysis of coffee farms in Brazil for sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 23(3–4):223–248. Available from: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJSD.2020.115223. doi:10.1504/IJSD.2020.115223.
Rainforest Alliance. 2022. Laporan data sertifikasi kopi 2021 [Internet]. [cited 2024 March 21]; Available from: https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/id/resource-item/laporan-data-sertifikasi-kopi-2021/.
Rayner T, Oberthür S, Hermwille L. 2021. A sectoral perspective on international climate governance: key findings and research priorities. Earth Syst Gov [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 8:100105. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000094. doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2021.100105.
Renard MC. 2022. Values and the making of standards in ‘sustainable’ coffee networks: the case of 4C and Nestlé in México. Int Sociol [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 37(6):758–776. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02685809221119289. doi:10.1177/02685809221119289.
Rich KM, Chengappa PG, Muniyappa A, Yadava CG, Manjyapura GS, Pradeepa Babu BN, Shubha YC, Rich M. 2018. Coffee certification in India: awareness, practices, and sustainability perception of growers. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 42(4):448–474. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21683565.2017.1361497. doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1361497.
van Rijsbergen B, Elbers W, Ruben R, Njuguna SN. 2016. The ambivalent impact of coffee certification on farmers’ welfare: a matched panel approach for cooperatives in Central Kenya. World Dev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 77:277–292. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X15002028. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.021.
Dos Santos RB, Torrisi NM, Pantoni RP. 2021. Third party certification of agri-food supply chain using smart contracts and blockchain tokens. Sensors [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 21(16):5307. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/16/5307?trk=public_post_comment-text. doi:10.3390/s21165307.
Sapkota P, Keenan RJ, Ojha HR. 2018. Community institutions, social marginalization and the adaptive capacity: a case study of a community forestry user group in the Nepal Himalayas. For Policy Econ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 92:55–64. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934116304543. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.001.
Seitanidi M, Crane A, Novak R. 2013. Social partnerships and responsible business: What, why and how? in social partnerships and responsible business (pp. 1-12). London (UK): Routledge.
Selsky JW, Parker B. 2005. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. J Manage [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 31(6):849–873. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=f287d2d739ecd4ee7ac8c41fc0d8325a26360ef. doi:10.1177/0149206305279601.
Sengere RW, Curry GN, Koczberski G. 2019. Forging alliances: Coffee grower and chain leader partnerships to improve productivity and coffee quality in Papua New Guinea. Asia Pac Viewp [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 60(2):220–235. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/apv.12222. doi:10.1111/apv.12222.
Shelton AM, Hossain MJ, Paranjape V, Azad AK, Rahman ML, Khan ASMMR, Prodhan MZH, Rashid MA, Majumder R, Hossain MA, et al. 2018. Bt eggplant project in Bangladesh: history, present status, and future direction. Front Bioeng Biotechnol [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 6(AUG):106. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00106/full?&utm. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00106.
Silva ME, Dias GP, Gold S. 2020. Exploring the roles of lead organisations in spreading sustainability standards throughout food supply chains in an emerging economy. Int J Logist Manag [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 32(3):1030–1049. Available from: https://www.ufpi.br/arquivos_download/arquivos/PICOS/Silva_Dias_and_Gold_2020.pdf. doi:10.1108/IJLM-05-2020-0201.
Starobin SM. 2021. Credibility beyond compliance: Uncertified smallholders in sustainable food systems. Ecol Econ [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 180:106767. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800918315969. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106767.
Stephenson PJ, Bakarr M, Bowles-Newark N, Kleinschroth F, Mapendembe A, Ntiamoa-Baidu Y, Obura D, Ratsifandrihamanana N, Simaika J, Sitati N, et al. 2021. Conservation science in Africa: mainstreaming biodiversity information into policy and decision-making. Closing Knowledge-Implementation Gap Conserv Sci Interdiscip Evid Transf Across Sect Spat Scales [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 22]; 287–321. Available from: doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81085-6_11.
Sustainable Coffee Program. 2014. Indonesia a business case for sustainable coffee production [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 27]; Available from: http://www.sustainablecoffeeprogram.com/en/resources.
Syahyuti SW, Suhaeti RN, Zakaria AK, Nurasa T. 2014. Kajian peran organisasi petani dalam mendukung pembangunan pertanian. Bogor (ID): Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian (PSEKP).
Tian Z, Wang JW, Li J, Han B. 2021. Designing future crops: challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture. Plant J [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 105(5):1165–1178. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/tpj.15107. doi:10.1111/tpj.15107.
Vestergaard A, Langevang T, Morsing M, Murphy L. 2021. Partnerships for development: assessing the impact potential of cross-sector partnerships. World Dev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 143:105447. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X21000590. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105447.
Voora V, Bermúdez S, Larrea C. 2019. Global market report: coffee [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 12]; Winnipeg (Can): International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). Available from: https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/ssi-global-market-report-coffee.pdf
Wahyudi A, Wulandari S, Aunillah A, Alouw JC. 2020. Sustainability certification as a pillar to promote Indonesian coffee competitiveness. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; Vol. 418. IOP Publishing. p. 12009. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/418/1/012009/pdf.
Wang H, Xiong W, Wu G, Zhu D. 2018. Public–private partnership in public administration discipline: a literature review. Public Manag Rev [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 20(2):293–316. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445.
Werhane PH, Newton LH, Wolfe R. 2020. Alleviating poverty through profitable partnerships: Globalization, markets, and economic well-being. London (UK): Routledge.
Westermann O, Förch W, Thornton P, Körner J, Cramer L, Campbell B. 2018. Scaling up agricultural interventions: Case studies of climate-smart agriculture. Agric Syst [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 165:283–293. Available from: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstreams/d7021a33-0240-4323-9070-cc95cf93d619/download. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.07.007.
Wiguna S, Karimi S, Ridwan E. 2019. Dampak skema relasi kopi sebagai pengembangan perekonomian petani kopi di pedesaan. Agriekonomika [Internet]. [disitasi 2024 Jan 22]; 8(1):93–103. Tersedia dari: https://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/agriekonomika/article/download/5027/3556
Witte JM, Reinicke WH, Benner T. 2017. Beyond multilateralism: global public policy networks. In Challenges of globalization (pp. 109-128). London (UK): Routledge.
World Bank. 2007. World development report 2008: Agriculture for development [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 14]; Rome: The World Bank. Available from: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/epdf/10.1596/978-0-8213-6807-7 doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-6807-7
Zhan JX. 2021. GVC transformation and a new investment landscape in the 2020s: Driving forces, directions, and a forward-looking research and policy agenda. J Int Bus Policy [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 22]; 4(2):206–220. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s42214-020-00088-0.pdf. doi:10.1057/s42214-020-00088-0.
