PENGUATAN KELEMBAGAAN GOTONG ROYONG DALAM PERSPEKTIF SOSIO BUDAYA BANGSA : Suatu Upaya Revitalisasi Adat Istiadat dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan
Keywords:
custom revitalization, gotong royong institution, society, government, people progress, revitalisasi adat-istiadat, kelembagaan gotong royong, masyarakat, pemerintahan, kemajuan bangsaAbstract
Gotong royong is social capital found in most of Indonesian sub-cultures. In gotong royong instituion we find social values, collective spirit, mutual collective trust, and organization aimed at common progress. Roles of gotong royong are significant in alleviating Indonesian from undeveloped economy of basic needs and foreign dominance. Gotong royong institution revitalization is necessary to involve people through deep participation in order to implement good governance. Upper aspect of gotong royong is norms. It is possible to improve social structure through gotong royong both at local and national levels. Collective, focused movement of this institution enables the government to establish self-reliance society based on social justice. Therefore it needs political will from all stakeholders both at regional and central levels.
References
Blau, P.M. 1967. Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
Chen, X. 2003. Magic or Myth? Social Capital and Its Consequences in the Asian, Chinese, and Vietnamese Contexts. http://www.uic.edu/ depts/soci/xmchen/xmchen_social%20capital.pdf [04/11/08].
Crough, H. 1986. Militer dan Politik di Indonesia. Penerbit Sinar Harapan. Jakarta.
Fukuyama,F. 2000. Social Capital. in Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress (Edited by L.E. Harrison and S.P. Hutington). Basic Books. New York.
Grootaert, C. 1998. Social Capital: The Missing Link?. Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development. The World Bank.
Harrison, E.H. 2000. Why Culture Matters. In Cultures Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress (Edited by L.E. Harrison and S.P. Huntington). Basic Books. New York.
Huntington, S.P. 2000. Cultures Count. in Cultures Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress (Edited by L.E. Harrison and S.P. Huntington). Basic Books. New York.
Korten, D.C. 1990. Strategies of Development-oriented NGOs: Four Generations. Getting to the 21st Century - Voluntary Action and The Global Agenda http://www.caledonia.org.uk/ d-korten.htm [14/11/08]
Mannheim, K. 1991. Ideologi and Utopia: Menyingkap Kaitan Pikiran dan Politik. Penerbit Kanisius. Jakarta.
Montgomery, J.D. 1998. Social Capital Research Center, John F. Kennedy Center, Harvard University. Cambridge.
Muhaimin, Y.A. 1990. Bisnis dan Politik: Kebijaksanaan Ekonomi Indonesia 1950-1980. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Pranadji, T. 2003. Menuju Transformasi Kelembagaan dalam Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Bogor.
Pranadji, T. 2004. Kerangka Kebijakan Sosio-Budaya Menuju Pertanian 2025: Ke Arah Pertanian Pedesaan Berdaya Saing Tinggi, Berkeadilan dan Berkelanjutan. Forum Agro Ekonomi, 22(1):1-21.
Pranadji, T. 2005. Pemberdayaan Kelembagaan dan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Lahan dan Air. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 3(3):235-255.
Pranadji, T. 2008. Ormas dan Peningkatan Komu-nikasi Politik: Upaya Penguatan Wawasan Kebangsaan dan Peningkatan Stabilitas Nasional di Wilayah Rawan Konflik. Makalah disampaikan pada kegiatan “Penguatan Ruang Publik Melalui Forum Dialog Kebangsaan Bagi Masyarakat di Wilayah Rawan Konflik dan Komunikasi Politik di Kalangan Masyarakat, Direktorat Jenderal Kesatuan Bangsa dan Politik – Depdagri, 30 Oktober 2008, Hotel Mercure – Jakarta.
Tjondronegoro, S.M.P. 1977. The Organization Phenomenon and Planned Development in Rural Communities of Java: A Case Study of Kecamatan Cibadak, West Java and Kecamatan Kendal, Central Java. University of Indonesia. Jakarta. (Disertasi).
