JARINGAN SOSIAL (NETWORKS) DALAM PENGEMBANGAN SISTEM DAN USAHA AGRIBISNIS: Perspektif Teori dan Dinamika Studi Kapital Sosial
Keywords:
social network, social capital, vertical mobility, agribusiness system, jaringan sosial, kapital sosial, mobilitas vertikal, sistem agribisnisAbstract
The limited possession of resources such as physical capital especially land, finance, and technology need social resources empowerment as potential local resources followed by equality and inclusiveness in implementing of development programs. This paper tries to elaborate sociological theory in the dynamics of social capital study especially social networks linked to the social reality on empirical level. In line with the theories of new institutionalism, social networks, diffusion of innovation, and social mobilit, on the empirical level it shows that agribusiness development is not supported by synchronization of policy environment in macro level, informal rules at meso level, and individual needs in micro level and availability of informal rules at meso and micro levels in the community. The failure of agribusiness development is also believed to be affected by unequal social-resources and also by less concern on the effect of economic benefit on social network, i.e. without considering the following aspects, e.g. (i) Norm and density network; (ii) The Strength of Weak Ties; (iii) The Importance of " Structural Holes; and (iv) The Interpenetration of Economic and Non-Economic Action in developing agribusiness. Agribusiness community will keep facing obstacles to grab opportunity in accessing information and technology innovation and in turn it will lower productivity, income and welfare as well as vertical mobility.
References
Bourdeau, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital. dalam J Richardson, ed. Handbooks of Theory and Research for Socoiology of Education. Westport, CT. Greenwood Press.
Coleman, JS. 1988. Social Capital in The Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology. Volume 94.
Dasgupta P dan Serageldin I. 2002. Social Capital: A Multi Faceted Perspective. Worl Bank, Washington.
Davis, J. Dan Goldberg, R. 1957. A Concept of Agribusiness. Harvard University, Boston, USA dalam Syahyuti. 2006. 30 Konsep Penting dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan dan Pertanian. PT. Bina Rena Pariwara. Jakarta.
Departemen Pertanian. 2005. Rencana Strategis Pembangunan Pertanian 2005-2009. Ja-karta.
Departemen Pertanian. 2006. Pedoman Umum Prima Tani-Program Rintisan dan Akselerasi Pemasyarakatan Inovasi Teknologi Perta-nian. Jakarta.
Granovetter M. 2005. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economis Perspectives. Vol. 19 No. 1.
Grootaert C; Oh Gi-Taek; Swamy A. 2002. Social Capital, Household Welfare and Poverty in Burkina Faso. Jurnal of African Economic, Vol.11 No.1.004-38.
Grotaert C. 1999. Social Capital, Houshold Welfare and Poverty in Indonesia. World Bank Working Paper (unpublished).
Horton, P.B dan Hunt, C.L. 1984. Sosiologi (Dialibahasakan Aminudin Sam). Penerbit Erlangga. Surabaya.
Ibrahim, Linda Darmajanti 2005. Kehidupan Berorganisasi sebagai Modal Sosial Komunitas Bali. Disertasi. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
Johnson , DP. 1988. Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern (Diindonesiakan oleh Robert M.Z. Lawang). Penerbit PT. Gramedia. Jakarta.
Lawang, R.M.Z. 2005. Kapital Sosial dalam Perspektif Sosiologik. Cetakan Kedua. FISIP UI Press. Depok.
Lawson, T; Jones, M; dan Moores R. 2000. Advanced Sociology Through Diagrams. Oxford University Press. Oxford New York.
Levitte, Y. 2004. Bonding Social Capital in Enterpreneurial Developing Communities-Survival Networks or Barriers?. Journal of the Community Development Society. Columbus:2004. Vol.35.
Lin, N. 2000. Inequality in Social Capital. Contemporary Sociology. Washington: Nov 2000. Vol. 29 p: 785, 11 pgs
Lionberger, HF and Gwin, PH. 1991. Technology Transfer from Researchers to User. University of Missouri. Missouri.
Liu, A.Q dan Besser, T. 2003. Social Capital and Participation in Community Improvement Activities by Elderly Residents in Small Town and Rural Communities. Rural Sociology. College Station: Sep 2003. Vol 68; p: 343
Nee, Victor. 2005. The New Institutionalisms in Economics and Sociology. In Smelser J. Neil and Richard Swedberg (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton University Press.
Netting, R M.C. 1993. Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Standford University Press. California.
Nunn A, Johnson S, Monro S, Bickerstaffe T, and Kelsey S. 2007. Factor Influencing Social Mobility (Research Report No.450, Carried Out by the Policy Research Institute on Behalf of the Departemen Of Work and Pensions United Kingdom). Norwich NR3 1 BQ.
Pantoja E. 1999. Exploring the Concept of SC and Its Relevancy for Community based Development. Te case of Mining Areas in Orissa, India. South Asia. Infrastructure Unit, The Worl Bank.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 7 Tahun 2005 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah (RPJM) 2004-2009
Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Ritzer, G dan Goodman D.J. 2003. Modern Sociological Teory. Mc.Graw-Hill.
Rogers, E.M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovation. The Free Press. New York.
Roling, N. 1988. Extension Science. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Roth, G dan Wittich. 1978. Max Weber: Ecomony and Society. University of California Press. Berkeley (p.24-26).
Rudestam, K.E & Newton R.R. 2001. Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process (Second Edition). Sage Publication, Inc. London.
Schoorl, J.W. 1980. Sociologie Der Modernisering (Modernisasi: Pengantar Sosiologi Pemba-ngunan Negara-negara Sedang Berkem-bang), Diterjemahkan Soekadijo, R.G. 1980). PT. Gramedia. Jakarta (214-216).
Silva, D.MJ; Harpham, T; Huttly SR; Bartolini, R; and Penny, ME. 2007. “Understanding Sources and Types of Social Capital in Peru“ dalam Community Development Journal. Oxford: Jan 2007. Vol 12,Iss 1; p 19 pages
Sitorus, M.T.F, Soetarto, E. Lubis, D.P, Agusta, I. Pambudy, R (2001). Agribisnis Berbasis Komunitas: Sinergi Modal Ekonomi dan Modal Sosial. Laporan Hasil Penelitian yang diterbitkan untuk PT. Sang Hyang Seri (Persero) Bali dan Pusat Kajian Agria, Lembaga Penelitian IPB. Bogor. Pustaka Wira Usaha Muda. Bogor.
Sitorus, M.T.F. 1999. Bahaya Elitisme Agribisnis. Suatu Artikel dalam TROPIS No.10. Th. I. September 1999: h.29
Smelser J. Neil and Richard Swedberg. 2005 (“Introducing Economic Sociology”) (eds), in the Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton University Press.
Taylor, John G. 1989. From Modernization to Modes of Production. A Critique of Sociologist of Development and Underdevelopment. Macmillan. London.
Van den Ban A.W dan Hawkins, H.S. 1988. Agricultural Extension. Longman Scientific & Technical, New York.
Vipriyanti. N.U. 2007. Studi Sosial Ekonomi Tentang Keterkaitan Antara Modal Sosial dan Pembangunan Wilayah: Disertasi Pasca-sarjana IPB.Bogor
Woolcock M, dan Narayan D. 2000. Social Capital: Implication for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer. Vol.15.No.2 (Agustus 2000) p:225-249.
