OPERASIONALISASI SPEKTRUM DISEMINASI MULTI CHANNEL TEKNOLOGI PERTANIAN UNTUK DISEMINASI YANG EFEKTIF
Keywords:
agricultural innovation system, effective dissemination, MCDS, technological innovation, diseminasi efektif, inovasi teknologi, SDMC, sistem inovasi pertanianAbstract
Downstreaming information of Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Technology (IAARD) technology is carried out, among others, through the Multi Channel Dissemination Spectrum (MCDS). The SDMC employs various dissemination channels and actors to accelerate technology dissemination. MCDS discussions at the operating level are limited especially on how it contributes to more technology adoption. Referring to the Agricultural Innovation System, an innovation arises due to support of various subsystems ranging from technology providers, carriers, users, markets, policies, and interactions among subsystems. Likewise, the MCDS should be supported by its subsystems for an effective dissemination. This paper aims to contribute ideas on subsystems requirements in the implementation of the MCDS and how these subsystems can drive the delivered technology information to be adopted by users. The supporting subsystems (planning, approaches in the implementation process, policies, infrastructure) for technology implementation are essential in dissemination activities. As a system, MCDS does not only focus on delivering IAARD’s technology information, but the success of technological innovation must be supported by dissemination planning and its subsystems, technology application ecosystem, and interaction between potential users and technology producers.
References
Agogué M, Berthet E, Fredberg T, Le Masson P, Segrestin B, Stoetzel M, Wiener M, Yström A. 2017. Explicating the role of innovation intermediaries in the “unknown”: a contingency approach. J of Strat and Manag. 10:19–39.
Ajayi MT, Fatunbi AO, Akinbarnjo OO. 2018. Strategies for scaling agricultural technology in Africa. Accra (GH): Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA).
Arnold E, Bell M. 2001. Some new ideas about research for development. In: Partnerships at the Leading Edge: A Danish Vision for Knowledge, Research and Development. Report of the Commission on Development-Related Research Funded by Danida, 279–319. Copenhagen (DK): Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Danida.
Asfaw S., McCarthy N., Lipper L., Arslan A., Cattaneo A., 2016. What determines farmers’ adaptive capacity? Empirical evidence from Malawi. Food Security. The Scie Sociol Econ Food Prod Acce Food. 8(2). DOI: 10.1007/ s12571-016-0571-0.
Balitbangtan. 2004. Pedoman Umum Prima Tani. Jakarta (ID): Badan Litbang Pertanian.
Balitbangtan. 2011. Panduan spektrum diseminasi multi channel. Bogor (ID): Balai Besar Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian.
BBP2TP. 2018. Kajian adopsi inovasi teknologi hasil Balitbangtan. Laporan Akhir. Bogor (ID): Balai Besar Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian.
Bhattacharjya BR, Kakoty SK, Singha S. 2019. A Feedback mechanism for appropriate technology development and dissemination: case study approach. Tech in Society. 57:104–114.
Djaffar R. 2017. Diseminasi teknologi informasi pada masyarakat nelayan di Kabupaten Takalar dan Barru. J Pen Kom Opini Pub. 20(1):73–87.
Dogliotti S, García M, Peluffo S, Dieste J, Pedemonte A, Bacigalupe G, Scarlato M, Alliaume F, Alvarez J, Chiappe M. 2014. Co-innovation of family farm systems: a systems approach to sustainable agriculture. Agric Syst. 126:76–86
Ernst A. 2019. Review of factors influencing social learning within participatory environmental governance. Ecol Soc. 24.
Fielke SJ, Botha N, Reid J, Gray D, Blacket P, Park N, William T. 2017. Lessons for co-innovation in agricultural innovation systems: a multiple case study analysis and a conceptual model. J of Agric Ed Ex. 24(4):1–19.
Gorman M. 2019. Becoming an agricultural advisor–the rationale, the plan and the implementation of a model of reflective practice in extension higher education. J Agric Educ Ext. 25:179–191
Hermans F, Klerkx L, Roep D. 2015. Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems. J Agric Educ Ext. 21:35–54.
Hermans F, Sartas M, van Schagen B, van Asten P, Schut M. 2017. Social network analysis of multistakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PLoS ONE [Internet]. [diunduh 2020 Nov 13]; 12(2): e0169634. Tersedia dari: https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0169634
Indraningsih KS. 2018. Strategi diseminasi inovasi pertanian dalam mendukung pembangunan pertanian. Forum Penel Agro Econ. 35(2):107–123.
Ingram J, Gaskel P, Mills J, Dwyer J. 2020. How do we enact co-innovation with stakeholders in agricultural research projects? Managing the complex interplay between contextual and facilitation processes. J Rur Stud. 78:65–77.
Irawan, Dariah, A, Rachman, A. 2015. Pengembangan dan diseminasi inovasi teknologi pertanian mendukung optimalisasi pengelolaan lahan kering masam. J Sumb Lahan. 9(1): 37–50.
Jamal E, Mardiharini M, Sarwani M. 2008. Proses diseminasi pengelolaan tanaman dan sumberdaya terpadu (PTT) Padi: suatu pembelajaran dan perspektif kedepan. Anal Kebijak Pertan. 6(3):272–285.
Kebebe E. 2019. Bridging technology adoption gaps in livestock sector in Ethiopia: an innovation system perspective. Tech in Soc. (57):30–37.
King B, Fielke S, Bayne K, Klerkx L, Nettle R. 2019. Navigating shades of social capital and trust to leverage opportunities for rural innovation. J Rural Stud. 68:123–134.
Kusnadi T. 2018. Rekap kegiatan spectrum diseminasi multi channel di Bengkulu tahun 2011–2012 [Internet]. [diunduh 2021 Apr 10]. Tersedia dari: https://docplayer.info/69904092-Rekap-kegiatan-spektrum-diseminasi-multi-channel-di-bengkulu-tahun-unit-kerja-bptp-bengkulu.html .
Long TB, Blok V, Coninx I. 2016. Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. J Clean Prod [Internet]. [diunduh 2020 Nov 13]; 1–13. Tersedia dari: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044
Mardiharini M. 2018. Kajian efektivitas diseminasi padi dan bawang merah. Laporan Akhir. Bogor (ID): Balai Besar Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian.
Menconi ME, Grohmann D, Mancinelli C. 2017. European farmers and participatory rural appraisal: a systematic literature review on experiences to optimize rural development. Land Use Pol. 60:1–11
Musyafak A. 2020. Bridging leadership dan diseminasi teknologi. Bahan Tayang Bincang Santai Implementasi Strategi Diseminasi BBP2TP, Maret 2020. (Tidak dipublikasikan).
Rahmawati, Saleh A, Hubeis M, Purnaningsih N. 2017. Peran jaringan komunikasi spektrum diseminasi multi channel dalam pengelolaan tanaman terpadu padi di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah [Disertasi]. [Bogor (ID)]: Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Reed MS, Bryce R, Machen R. 2018. Pathways to policy impact: a new approach for planning and evidencing research impact. Ev Pol: J of Res Deb Prac. 14(3): 431–458.
Reichardt K, Rogge K. 2016. How the policy mix impacts innovation: findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany. Environ Innov SocTrans.18:62–81.
Rogers E. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York (US): The Free Press.
Rogge KS, Reichardt K. 2016. Policy mixes for sustainable transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis. Res Policy. 45:1620–1635.
Sharma V. 2017. The Bridging leadership in Mauritius. Global J of Man and Buss Res. 17(7).
Sarwani, M, Jamal, E, Subagyono, K, Sirnawati, E, Hanifah VW. 2011. Diseminasi di BPTP: Pemikiran inovatif transfer teknologi spesifik lokasi. Anal Kebijak Pertan. 9(1):73–89.
Sirnawati E, Mardianto S, Syahbuddin H. 2018. Pentingnya membangun supporting system diseminasi inovasi untuk kelangsungan adopsi teknologi. Dalam: Syahbuddin H, Mardianto S, Syahyuti, Wasito, Syafaat N, Hendayana R, editors. Model diseminasi dan pola adopsi teknologi dalam perspektif pembangunan pertanian perdesaan. Jakarta (ID): IAARD Press.
Sumardjo. 2012. Review dan refleksi model penyuluhan dan inovasi penyulihan masa depan. Perhimpunan Ahli Penyuluhan Pembangunan Indonesia (PAPPI). Institut Pertanian Bogor. (tidak dipublikasikan)
Sutisna E. 2016. Implementasi diseminasi multi channel pada masyarakat petani kakao di Kabupaten Manokwari – Papua Barat. Buletin Agro-Infotek. 2(1):1–7.
Suwanda MH, Sukarman. 2020. Manfaat inovasi teknologi sumberdaya lahan pertanian dalam mendukung pembangunan pertanian. J Sumb Lahan. 14(1):116–133.
Syakir M. 2016. Pemantapan inovasi dan diseminasi teknologi dalam memberdayakan petani. Dalam: Prosiding Nasional Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Petani dalam Rangka Pencapaian Kemandirian Pangan Nasional dan Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani [Internet]. [diunduh 2020 Aug 3]. Tersedia dari: http://pse.litbang.pertanian.go.id/ind/pdffiles/prosiding_2016/0_1.pdf
Turner JA, Allen W, Fraser C, Fenemor A, Horita A, White A, Chen L, Atkinson M, Rush M. 2020. Navigating institutional challenges: design to enable community participation in social learning for freshwater planning. Environ Manag. 65:288–305.
Turner JA, Klerkx L, Rijswijk K, Williams T, Barnard T. 2016. Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand agricultural innovation system: identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. NJAS - Wageningen J Life Sci. 76: 99–112.
World Bank 2007 Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. Washington DC (USA): The World Bank.
World Bank. 2012. Agricultural innovation systems: an investment sourcebook. Washington DC (USA): The World Bank.
