GAGASAN PEMBANGUNAN BERBASIS KUALITAS PENDUDUK DAN TATA NILAI SOSIO-BUDAYA
Keywords:
population, development of population, socio-cultural values, penduduk, pengembangan kependudukan, nilai sosio-budayaAbstract
Indonesia is one of the populous countries in the world, but lack in quality approach compared to other countries. The straight forward indicators used to find this quality are the figures of absolute poverty, corruption level, and weakness of people’s socio-cultural capital. Population quality should be viewed comprehensively which include physical number, economic, social, politic, and environment. This approach should be well applied to formulate development planning for population quality, particularly consideration about socio-cultural values inherent in the community. The socio-cultural value dimension will strongly determine the progress of the development and the level of the people’s progress in either small or big communities. A more complete and stronger value element, specifically for composite value component, will determine the level of people’s quality, especially when someone looks at its self-support, justice, solidarity, and sustainability dimensions and generation by generation.
References
Blau, P.M. 1967. Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons. New York.
Dube, S.P. 1988. Modernization and Development: The Search for Alternative Paradigms. The United Nations University, Tokyo-Zed Books Ltd. London.
Etzioni, A. 1961. A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organization on Power, Involve-ment, and Their Correlates. The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc. New York.
Huntington, S.P. 2000. Cultures Count. In Cultures Matters : How Values Shape Human Progress (Edited By L.E. Harrison and S.P. Huntington). Basic Books. New York.
Inayatullah. 1979. Conceptional Framework for the Country Studies of Rural Development. in Inayatullah (ed.). Approaches to Rural Development: Some Asian Experiences. Asian and Pacific Development Adminis-tration Center. Kualalumpur.
Koentjaraningrat. 1983. Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Penerbit Djambatan. Jakarta.
Lipset, S.M. and G.S. Lenz. 2000. Corruption, Culture, and Market. in Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress (edited L.E Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington). Basic Book. New York.
Munasinghe, M. 1993. Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development. The World Bank. Washington, D.C.
Pra Kongres I Kongres Nasional: Pembangunan Manusia Indonesia. Kerjasama Antara Tim Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (TKPK) & UNDP, 21-22 Maret 2006, Jakarta.
Pranadji, T. 2006. Model Pemberdayaan Masya-rakat Pedesaan Untuk Pengelolaan Agro-ekosistem Lahan Kering. Studi Penguatan Modal Sosial dalam Desa-desa (Hulu DAS) Ex Proyek Bangun Desa, Kabupaten Gunungkidul dan Ex Proyek Pertanian La-han Kering, Kabupaten Boyolali. Disertasi (tidak dipublikasikan).
Pranadji, T. 1993. Kajian Ekologi Kebudayaan Terhadap Sektor Informal di Perkotaan: Suatu Proses Adaptasi Ketidakseimba-ngan Interaksi Kota-Desa Akibat Indus-trialisasi. Forum Agro Ekonomi, 10(2) dan 11(1): 38-45. Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Bogor.
Sajogyo. 1974. Modernization without Development in Rural Java. (A Paper Contributed to the Study on Changes in Agrarian Structure, FAO of UN, 1972-1973). Bogor Agricultural University. Bogor.
Tim Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. 2006. Sudahkah Anda Tahu ? Pra-Kongres I Nasional : Pembangunan Manusia Indonesia, 21-22 Maret 2006, Jakarta.
Tjondronegoro, S.M.P. 1978. Modernisasi Pedesa-an: Pilihan Strategi Dasar Menuju Fase Lepas Landas. PRISMA, VII(3): 13-25. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Tjondronegoro, S.M.P. 1990. Revolusi Hijau dan Perubahan Sosial di Pedesaan Jawa. PRISMA, X(2):3-14, Juli 1990. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Van Dieren, W. 1995. Taking Nature into Account: A Report to The Club of Rome Toward a Sustainable National Income. Copernicus, Springer-Verlag New York Inc. New York.
